{"algorithm":"Ed25519","canonicalization":"JSON con chiavi ordinate (sort_keys), separatori compatti (',' ':'), ensure_ascii","payload":{"verdict_id":460,"claim_id":473,"claim_text":"Over 1,200 amendments tabled, 1% of peers tabling 60% of them, and that small number of peers made up more than a third of the total speaking time.","label":"vero","confidence":0.8,"explanation":"Around 1,300 amendments were tabled to the Bill in the Lords – a record for any bill. Roughly three-quarters were tabled by about nine peers (about 1% of the House) who oppose assisted dying, and opponents took the great majority of speaking time (opponents spoke ~55 of ~75 committee hours). The claim's figures ('over 1,200', '1% tabling 60%', 'more than a third of speaking time') are accurate and if anything understate the concentration.","sources":[{"url":"https://humanists.uk/2026/04/20/lords-assisted-dying-debate-transcript-is-longer-than-war-and-peace-filibuster-clear-and-obvious/","ente":"Humanists UK","titolo":"Lords' assisted dying debate transcript is longer than War and Peace – Filibuster clear and obvious","estratto":"Nearly 1,300 amendments proposed; around three-quarters tabled by about nine peers (~1% of Lords); opponents spoke ~55 hours, nearly three-quarters of the 75-hour committee stage."}],"issued_at":"2026-07-01T07:59:55+00:00"},"signature_b64":"sj+06br1f5A01bkA5cAj9qiELpfkZrWM5qD477DzBZr+qnWDexgbvm6RSx0xeXjrKKI7VPSsIo/Bfdyhx4AHAQ==","public_key_hex":"1719e2638a2cc0ec8d552d71dca52197f934e0a66b17e6364f1eed7a1d428e01","note":"Verifica offline: ed25519_verify(public_key, base64decode(signature_b64), canonical_json(payload))."}